Core Argument or Not?
Core arguments of verbs and nouns are analyzed as part of the argument
structure. Notably, the location argument of verbs of position and the
direction argument of verbs of movement are arguments. Sometimes it is hard to
tell whether a locational/directional PP is a core argument or not. Here we
provide specific answers based on looking at examples from CCGrebank.
The following verbs and their translations have location/direction core
arguments: stand, go, take. Exception: when the
location/direction is expressed by an adverb such as there, then that is
analyzed as a modifier.
The following verbs and their translations cannot have location/direction
arguments: hide, have fun, notice.
The following nouns and their translations cannot have location/direction
arguments: place.
A prepositional phrase headed by about or its translation, indicating
the topic of something (like information, or a book), is analyzed as a core
argument.
The verb translate and its translations can have core arguments for
the language into which something is translated.
Location PPs attaching to nouns, as in a book on the table, are not
treated as core arguments but as modifiers.
In look like, like heads a prepositional core argument.
Argument of Verb or Noun?
Sometimes an argument could be the argument of a verb, or of another
argument of the verb. As a general rule, when in doubt, we favor verb arguments
in these cases. Here is an example with a compound verb:
And here is an example with a non-compound verb:
Verbal Constructions with Particles and Prepositions
Similarly, when a verbal construction contains both a particle and a
preposition, we prefer to treat them as separate arguments of the verb rather
than attaching one to the other:
|
camminavo |
((S[dcl]\NP)/PP)/PR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP or S Modifier?
If the subject intervenes between a clausal modifier and the rest of the
clause, then the modifier is analyzed as a sentence modifier. Otherwise, it is
analyzed as a VP modifier. For example:
This also holds for conditional clauses. For example:
would |
(S[q]/(S[b]\NP))/NP |
if |
((S\NP)\(S\NP))/S[dcl] |
If the modified clause is a coordination, attach at the S
level instead:
and |
(S[dcl]\S[dcl])/S[dcl] |
Modification of Main Verb or Modal/Auxiliary?
When the modal or auxiliary verb of a clause does not intervene between a VP
modifier and the main verb, then the VP modifier modifies the main verb rather
than the modal or auxiliary. Exception: negation adverbs modify the modal or
auxiliary.
Modification of Adjective or Copula?
Adverbials appearing in a copula phrase with an adjective can modify the
adjective or the copula. Degree adverbials such as very modify the
adjective. Quantificational adverbials such as always, negation adverbs
such as not, temporal adverbials such as today, etc., modify the
copula.
NPs Acting as Modifiers
Temporal NPs can act as VP (or sentence) modifiers. Following CCGrebank, if
these NPs consist of an adjective followed by a noun, they are analyzed as in
the following example:
|
|
last |
((S\NP)\(S\NP))/((S\NP)\(S\NP)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If they consist of a determiner followed by an N
expression,
only the determiner gets a non-standard category:
Direct Speech
Speech verbs have fully specified argument categories, e.g.,
S[intj]
or S[dcl]
, not S
. For example:
Subjects of Auxiliary and Modal Verbs
In constructions with auxiliary and modal verbs, the subject is an argument
of the auxiliary/modal. Other arguments are arguments of the embedded verb.
Dativus commodi
We treat dativus commodi as part of the verb’s argument structure
(not every verb allows it):
|
kaufe |
((S[dcl]\NP)/NP)/NP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noun Postmodifiers and Premodifiers
Postmodifiers combine with a noun before the premodifiers:
Verbal Arguments
Verbal arguments of verbs and prepositions are analyzed as VPs unless they
have a determiner, in which case they are treated as nominalized (thus, as
nouns). For example:
|
is |
(S[dcl]\NP)/(S[pt]\NP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Italian di and da are treated as a complementizers rather
than prepositions (so get category (S[to]\NP)/(S[b]\NP)
) when they
head verbal arguments.
Adverbial Arguments
Adverbs that appear as arguments (e.g., of a preposition) get category
S[adj]\NP
. For example:
|
will |
(S[dcl]\NP)/(S[b]\NP) |
|
|
für |
((S\NP)/(S\NP))/(S[adj]\NP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adverbs Modifying Adjectives
Adverbs modifying adjectives are just that: modifiers of adjectives. When
the adjective is attributive, the adverb thus has category
(N/N)/(N/N)
(possible with different slash directions).
Participles Acting as Prenominal Modifiers
Participles pre-modifying a noun are analyzed as attribute adjectives:
Italian Noun-noun-compounds
In Italian, the dependent in a noun-noun compound is often realized as a
prepositional phrase. We treat this phrase as a modifer of the head noun, not
as an argument.